Re: [PATCHv4 00/51] another round of snapshot patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/02/2011 03:57 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:24:37PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
I think I've addressed most findings from round 3 - by implementing
  9      : New flag in API, sensible, ACK
  10 doesn't change default behaviour, looks fine, ACK
  11 ACK
  12 nasty, thanks for providing a new clean iterator, ACK
  13 ACK
  14 good, another iterator, ACK
  15 implementation of 9/ for qemu, ACK
  16 ACK
  17 ACK
  18 ACK
  19 new API flags, ACK
  20 ACK
  21 virsh extensions, ACK
  22 ACK
  23 ACK
  24 ACK
  25 ACK unfortunately the half baked state of 0.9.4 is gonna remain
         for a while
  26 ACK
  27 I'm not so sure about that, as the caching is infinite. Some module
     rely on inotify already, and best would be to add an utility for
     inotify use and then use it on the dirs of $PATH, then upon change
     discard the cacher path
     I would push for now but add a TODO to fix that problem
  28 ACK
  29 Isn't there a way to save the domain snapshot on shared storage when
     available to try to avoid the problem ? It wouldn't work all the
     time but might be simpler than rolling out a v4. or consider the
     snapshot data as extra domain resource that could be migrated on
     the fly like we can do for disk images in some cases.

I've now pushed 9 and 15-29, for BZ 735457. I still have to figure out how to auto-clean snapshot metadata for transient domains, but that will have to be after patch 51 is in.

--
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]