On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:40:13PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 09/02/2011 03:57 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:24:37PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > >>I think I've addressed most findings from round 3 - by implementing > > > > >Review: > > 1 ACK > > 2 ACK > > 3,4,5,6: New flags in API ACK, it would be good to have regression tests > > tracking all the events sent in the various cases... > > 7, 8 ACK > > 2-8 now pushed for BZ 733762; hopefully, everyone is okay with me > doing self-review and amendments to patch 6 and 7 along the way. Sure, no problem :) > (When the patch series is this big, I've flushed enough mental state > along the way to be reviewing my own patches from a much cleaner > condition than usual for a single patch, so I'm actually finding > good fixes :) That and a good night of sleep helps ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list