When a detail message is presented, nobody expects prefix 'invalid argument in' but something more general, like 'invalid argument:'. --- src/util/virterror.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/util/virterror.c b/src/util/virterror.c index c5babb1..f4541bd 100644 --- a/src/util/virterror.c +++ b/src/util/virterror.c @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ virErrorMsg(virErrorNumber error, const char *info) if (info == NULL) errmsg = _("invalid argument in"); else - errmsg = _("invalid argument in %s"); + errmsg = _("invalid argument: %s"); break; case VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED: if (info != NULL) -- 1.7.3.4 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list