于 2011年07月27日 17:51, Daniel P. Berrange 写道:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 05:34:19PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
于 2011年07月27日 18:07, Osier Yang 写道:
---
daemon/libvirtd.c | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/daemon/libvirtd.c b/daemon/libvirtd.c
index 9e044e2..61f5a2d 100644
--- a/daemon/libvirtd.c
+++ b/daemon/libvirtd.c
@@ -1572,6 +1572,12 @@ cleanup:
if (pid_file)
unlink (pid_file);
+ if (sock_file&& sock_file[0] != '@')
+ unlink(sock_file);
+
+ if (sock_file_ro&& sock_file_ro[0] != '@')
+ unlink(sock_file_ro);
+
NACK to this - cleanup should be done in the RPC classes
With this patch, the socket files could be removed successfully.
But it looks to me virNetSocketFree already unlink the socket files,
it's weired
the unix socket files still exists after daemon shutdown. So, this patch
might be
not quite right.
Yes, that suggests that virNetServerFree or something that
it calls is not cleaning up properly. It could be a missing
free somewhere, or a reference being held open.
It looks to me the "ref" is right from the debug log, (not missed
somewehre).
It might be desirable to add an explicit virNetServerClose()
API which closes all sockets& unlinks them, separately
from virNetServerFree, so we ensure cleanup even in the event
of a reference count being leaked
Yes, agree.
Daniel
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list