On 07/18/2011 12:35 AM, Alex Jia wrote:
Hi Daniel,
# rpm -q libvirt
libvirt-0.9.3-3.el6.x86_64
Regards,
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel P. Berrange"<berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Alex Jia"<ajia@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Matthias Bolte"<matthias.bolte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 6:12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] network: avoid memory leak on cleanup
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 03:03:07PM +0800, Alex Jia wrote:
On 07/15/2011 02:49 PM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
2011/7/15<ajia@xxxxxxxxxx>:
* src/network/bridge_driver.c: Fix memory leak on cleanup section from
networkGetBridgeName function.
---
src/network/bridge_driver.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/network/bridge_driver.c b/src/network/bridge_driver.c
index 0a12bc0..59e780d 100644
--- a/src/network/bridge_driver.c
+++ b/src/network/bridge_driver.c
@@ -2474,7 +2474,8 @@ static char *networkGetBridgeName(virNetworkPtr net) {
cleanup:
if (network)
virNetworkObjUnlock(network);
- return bridge;
+ VIR_FREE(bridge);
+ return NULL;
}
static int networkGetAutostart(virNetworkPtr net,
NACK. Now networkGetBridgeName returns NULL always, that's wrong.
Why do you think that there is a leak?
Detected in valgrind run:
==9020== 7 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 26
==9020== at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==9020== by 0x386A314B3D: xdr_string (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==9020== by 0x4CFC0AD: xdr_remote_nonnull_string (remote_protocol.c:30)
==9020== by 0x4CFCC08: xdr_remote_network_get_bridge_name_ret (remote_protocol.c:1999)
==9020== by 0x4D06FC1: virNetMessageDecodePayload (virnetmessage.c:286)
==9020== by 0x4D03235: virNetClientProgramCall (virnetclientprogram.c:318)
==9020== by 0x4CE7262: call (remote_driver.c:3925)
==9020== by 0x4CED8D2: remoteNetworkGetBridgeName (remote_client_bodies.h:3384)
==9020== by 0x4CC494E: virNetworkGetBridgeName (libvirt.c:8503)
==9020== by 0x40F654: cmdNetworkInfo (virsh.c:5015)
==9020== by 0x410D02: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:12738)
==9020== by 0x41F2D5: main (virsh.c:14084)
==9020==
==9020== 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3 of 26
==9020== at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==9020== by 0x386A27F8A1: strdup (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==9020== by 0x4CF508B: doRemoteOpen (remote_driver.c:364)
==9020== by 0x4CF6E8F: remoteOpen (remote_driver.c:800)
==9020== by 0x4CCB384: do_open (libvirt.c:1054)
==9020== by 0x4CCBEB5: virConnectOpenAuth (libvirt.c:1280)
==9020== by 0x410BC0: vshReconnect (virsh.c:589)
==9020== by 0x410DCF: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:12733)
==9020== by 0x41F2D5: main (virsh.c:14084)
==9020==
==9020== 56 (24 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 17 of 26
==9020== at 0x4A04A28: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==9020== by 0x4C686ED: virAlloc (memory.c:101)
==9020== by 0x4C96870: virDomainEventStateNew (domain_event.c:578)
==9020== by 0x4CF5A8E: doRemoteOpen (remote_driver.c:658)
==9020== by 0x4CF6E8F: remoteOpen (remote_driver.c:800)
==9020== by 0x4CCB384: do_open (libvirt.c:1054)
==9020== by 0x4CCBEB5: virConnectOpenAuth (libvirt.c:1280)
==9020== by 0x410BC0: vshReconnect (virsh.c:589)
==9020== by 0x410DCF: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:12733)
==9020== by 0x41F2D5: main (virsh.c:14084)
What version of libvirt did you test this on ? These were leaks
in the 0.9.3 release, but current GIT has fixed them
Daniel
Now, it's fine for libvirt-0.9.3-5.el6.x86_64, I haven't found remote
leak again.
Regards,
Alex
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list