On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 03:03:07PM +0800, Alex Jia wrote:
> On 07/15/2011 02:49 PM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> >2011/7/15<ajia@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>* src/network/bridge_driver.c: Fix memory leak on cleanup section from
> >> networkGetBridgeName function.
> >>---
> >> src/network/bridge_driver.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/src/network/bridge_driver.c b/src/network/bridge_driver.c
> >>index 0a12bc0..59e780d 100644
> >>--- a/src/network/bridge_driver.c
> >>+++ b/src/network/bridge_driver.c
> >>@@ -2474,7 +2474,8 @@ static char *networkGetBridgeName(virNetworkPtr net) {
> >> cleanup:
> >> if (network)
> >> virNetworkObjUnlock(network);
> >>- return bridge;
> >>+ VIR_FREE(bridge);
> >>+ return NULL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> static int networkGetAutostart(virNetworkPtr net,
> >NACK. Now networkGetBridgeName returns NULL always, that's wrong.
> >
> >Why do you think that there is a leak?
> >
> Detected in valgrind run:
> ==9020== 7 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 26
> ==9020== at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
> ==9020== by 0x386A314B3D: xdr_string (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
> ==9020== by 0x4CFC0AD: xdr_remote_nonnull_string (remote_protocol.c:30)
> ==9020== by 0x4CFCC08: xdr_remote_network_get_bridge_name_ret (remote_protocol.c:1999)
> ==9020== by 0x4D06FC1: virNetMessageDecodePayload (virnetmessage.c:286)
> ==9020== by 0x4D03235: virNetClientProgramCall (virnetclientprogram.c:318)
> ==9020== by 0x4CE7262: call (remote_driver.c:3925)
> ==9020== by 0x4CED8D2: remoteNetworkGetBridgeName (remote_client_bodies.h:3384)
> ==9020== by 0x4CC494E: virNetworkGetBridgeName (libvirt.c:8503)
> ==9020== by 0x40F654: cmdNetworkInfo (virsh.c:5015)
> ==9020== by 0x410D02: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:12738)
> ==9020== by 0x41F2D5: main (virsh.c:14084)
> ==9020==
> ==9020== 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3 of 26
> ==9020== at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
> ==9020== by 0x386A27F8A1: strdup (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
> ==9020== by 0x4CF508B: doRemoteOpen (remote_driver.c:364)
> ==9020== by 0x4CF6E8F: remoteOpen (remote_driver.c:800)
> ==9020== by 0x4CCB384: do_open (libvirt.c:1054)
> ==9020== by 0x4CCBEB5: virConnectOpenAuth (libvirt.c:1280)
> ==9020== by 0x410BC0: vshReconnect (virsh.c:589)
> ==9020== by 0x410DCF: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:12733)
> ==9020== by 0x41F2D5: main (virsh.c:14084)
> ==9020==
> ==9020== 56 (24 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 17 of 26
> ==9020== at 0x4A04A28: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
> ==9020== by 0x4C686ED: virAlloc (memory.c:101)
> ==9020== by 0x4C96870: virDomainEventStateNew (domain_event.c:578)
> ==9020== by 0x4CF5A8E: doRemoteOpen (remote_driver.c:658)
> ==9020== by 0x4CF6E8F: remoteOpen (remote_driver.c:800)
> ==9020== by 0x4CCB384: do_open (libvirt.c:1054)
> ==9020== by 0x4CCBEB5: virConnectOpenAuth (libvirt.c:1280)
> ==9020== by 0x410BC0: vshReconnect (virsh.c:589)
> ==9020== by 0x410DCF: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:12733)
> ==9020== by 0x41F2D5: main (virsh.c:14084)
What version of libvirt did you test this on ? These were leaks
in the 0.9.3 release, but current GIT has fixed them
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list