On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 08:11:20AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 07/14/2011 08:08 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >> That would be a valid concern if we passed internal flags over the wire, > >> but we don't. > > > > I'm thinking about the case where a value we currently use for an > > internal flag, gets used for a public flag in the future. In that > > case, any client side checks for curent internal flags would be > > bogus. > > Then we already have the bogus situation, where libvirt.c is silently > filtering out internal flags. I wasn't aware of any existing filtering - we must remove any such cases. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list