Re: [PATCHv2 04/27] libvirt-qemu: use unsigned flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/13/2011 03:54 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> 2011/7/8 Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Like commit 1740c381, but for libvirt-qemu.
>>
>> * src/remote/qemu_protocol.x (qemu_monitor_command_args): Adjust
>> type to match API.
>> * src/qemu_protocol-structs: Update accordingly.
>> ---
>>
>> v2: new patch
>>
>>  src/qemu_protocol-structs  |    2 +-
>>  src/remote/qemu_protocol.x |    4 ++--
>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Should we have a syntax-check rule to enforce unsigned int flags in
> the RPC protocol like you added a rule to do this in the public API.

The syntax-check rule in 27/27 should cover this - it will complain if
we introduce a 'int flags;' in any of the *protocol.x files, which
should prod us to use 'unsigned int flags;' instead.

Or are you referring to the fact that patch 27/27 only checked
libvirt.h.in for additions of '...long flags', to ensure that no more
than the existing 4 uses for migration are added?  In that case, yeah,
that rule can be enhanced to check include/libvirt/libvirt-qemu.h as
well, to ensure that all new public APIs, whether for libvirt proper or
for libvirt-qemu, use 'unsigned int flags'.  But that's a tweak to 27,
not to this one, so I pushed 4/27 as-is.

> 
> ACK.
> 

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]