On 06/24/2011 09:27 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>> @@ -819,4 +847,5 @@ virSecurityDriver virAppArmorSecurityDriver = {
>> AppArmorRestoreSavedStateLabel,
>>
>> AppArmorSetImageFDLabel,
>> + AppArmorSetProcessFDLabel,
>> };
Should we do a separate patch to make the security drivers use C99 named
initialization, instead of C89 order-based, to match how most other
driver callback structures are now set up?
--
Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list