Re: [PATCH] storage: Deactive lv before remove it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/09/2011 08:33 AM, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
Hi

On 06/08/11 17:01, Osier Yang wrote:
This is to address BZ# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702260,
though even if with this patch, the user might see error like
"Unable to deactivate logical volume",

Can you try the attached patch?
(in addition to the upstream lvm fix you mentioned below)

Recent distributions generate udev events *after* the use of
devices through "watch" rules.
As a result, lvremove/lvchange can race with it and fail to
remove/deactivate volume.

I haven't tested the patch but I could fix the similar
problem of lvremove by putting 'udevadm settle' before that.
So I think it's worth trying.

it could fix the problem if the
lv is referred to by another existing LVs, allowing the user remove
the lv successfully without seeing error like "Can't remove open logical
volume".

For the error "Unable to deactivate logical volume", libvirt can't do
more, it's problem of lvm, see BZ#:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570359

And the patch applied to upstream lvm to fix it:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/2011-May/msg00025.html

This lvm patch fixes only the case where lvremove itself generates udev events.
You'll still see the problem as the udev events will be generated when
a VM finishes using the volume, for example.


The patch looks better than using "lvchange -an", I will try it first.
Thanks.

Regards
Osier

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]