Re: (how much) support for kqemu domain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/06/2011 02:19 PM, John Lumby wrote:
> Hello Eric.
> 
> I am fairly sure I remember *someone* saying they had integrated a
> modified version of the fix into libvirt but can't find any email saying
> so now.     Maybe Daniel?      On a very quick look at 0.9.2 source,    
> it *appears* to have been implemented in qemu_command.c  (but I didn't
> verify running it).

Thanks for your reply; I see it in the current sources as well.  Looks
like commit 6e44ec7a was the winner.

Oh well, a bit more digging and I could have spared wasting time on
email.  :)

>>> +    else if (disableKQEMU == -1) {
>>> +        ADD_ARG_LIT("-enable-kqemu");
>>> +        ADD_ARG_LIT("-kernel-kqemu");

The code uses a new variable enableKQEMU, as a nicer spelling than
overloading disableKQEMU into a tri-state with double-negative
interpretation.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]