2011/5/31 Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 05/30/2011 12:33 PM, Matthias Bolte wrote: >> We commonly use "value, length" order, let's stick to this. >> --- >> Âdaemon/remote.c      Â|  40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >> Âsrc/remote/remote_driver.c |  40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >> Â2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) > > ACK. Â(Does it show that I built up the factored function incrementally, > without realizing that the end result ended up going against convention?) > You might also just have matched the XDR on-the-wire ordering of arrays :) Thanks, pushed. Matthias -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list