On 22.05.2011 16:42, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> ---
> Building with ENABLE_DEBUG=0 showed more errors,
> because VIR_DEBUG() get replaced with dummy 'do {} while(0)' statement,
> and compiler complains about unused parameters. So if anybody knows
> how to get rid of this ... Note that I am speaking about '...' part in
> VIR_DEBUG_INT() definition.
>
> src/util/command.c | 9 +++------
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/command.c b/src/util/command.c
> index ebb90cb..4b8a940 100644
> --- a/src/util/command.c
> +++ b/src/util/command.c
> @@ -962,9 +962,8 @@ virCommandProcessIO(virCommandPtr cmd)
> } else {
> inoff += done;
> if (inoff == inlen) {
> - int tmpfd = infd;
> if (VIR_CLOSE(infd) < 0)
> - VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", tmpfd);
> + VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", infd);
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -1145,17 +1144,15 @@ virCommandRun(virCommandPtr cmd, int *exitstatus)
> VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", tmpfd);
> }
> if (cmd->outbuf == &outbuf) {
> - int tmpfd = cmd->outfd;
> if (VIR_CLOSE(cmd->outfd) < 0)
> - VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", tmpfd);
> + VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", cmd->outfd);
> cmd->outfdptr = NULL;
> cmd->outbuf = NULL;
> VIR_FREE(outbuf);
> }
> if (cmd->errbuf == &errbuf) {
> - int tmpfd = cmd->errfd;
> if (VIR_CLOSE(cmd->errfd) < 0)
> - VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", tmpfd);
> + VIR_DEBUG("ignoring failed close on fd %d", cmd->errfd);
> cmd->errfdptr = NULL;
> cmd->errbuf = NULL;
> VIR_FREE(errbuf);
NACK. I misunderstood the concept of VIR_CLOSE. But the problem written
above persists.
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list