On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 07:06:46AM -0400, Mark Wagner wrote: > On 05/19/2011 03:34 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: Hi Mark, > I think that maybe I didn't fully understand the entire context. Well I wasn't sure either if the problem was lack of expressivity or some problem in the syntax :-) > My main goal is to make sure that we consider the differences > between NUMA and simple CPU pinning. After a rereading the threads > and some conversations it appears that you are doing that. Ah, good, hopefully you will be able to fully check the result soon > Sorry for the noise on this issue Well I prefer a bit of noise and making sure things are implemented fully than pushing ode that would not be adequate, so no problem ! :-) > btw - I must say that I think that the libvirt team is doing a > great job overall in getting support for the features that are needed > to achieve good to top performance from KVM. I actually based a lot of > my Summit presentation around using libvirt and virt-manager. Once NUMA > support is in, I expect that we will see some SPECvirt submissions that are > based on libvirt. Thanks for all of the hard work! Thanks for the kind words, hopefully we will be able to get all of the results using libvirt soon :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list