On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:34:24AM +0200, Michal PrÃvoznÃk wrote: > On 05/12/2011 06:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:29:07PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > ... > > So, eg with a config like > > > > <video> > > <model type='qxl' vram='9216' heads='2'/> > > <alias id='video0'/> > > </video> > > <video> > > <model type='qxl' vram='9216' heads='4'/> > > <alias id='video1'/> > > </video> > > > > Then, screen is calculated as > > > > Screen Device Head > > 0 video0 0 > > 1 video0 1 > > 2 video1 0 > > 3 video1 1 > > 4 video1 2 > > 5 video1 3 > > > > > > > > Incidentally an RFE is needed against QEMU, since it can only do screen > > dump of the first device :-( > > > > Daniel > > Yes, that is what I had in my mind when creating this concept. Ok, please document that in the API docs for the public API > Or would it be better to split screen ID into video # and head #? No, I think that's probably overkill, unless anyone can think of something we can do with them separated, that we can't do with them combined... Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list