2011/4/11 Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 04/10/2011 05:28 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote: >> --- >> Âsrc/esx/esx_vi_types.c |  20 ++++++++++---------- >> Â1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/esx/esx_vi_types.c b/src/esx/esx_vi_types.c >> index 9e23030..29a3c39 100644 >> --- a/src/esx/esx_vi_types.c >> +++ b/src/esx/esx_vi_types.c >> @@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ >>   Âint                                    \ >>   ÂesxVI_##__type##_Validate(esxVI_##__type *item)              \ >>   Â{                                     \ >> -    Âconst char *type_name = esxVI_Type_ToString(esxVI_Type_##__type);   \ >> +    Âconst char *typeName = esxVI_Type_ToString(esxVI_Type_##__type);   Â\ >>                                        Â\ >>     Âif (item->_type <= esxVI_Type_Undefined ||              Â\ >>       Âitem->_type >= esxVI_Type_Other) {                Â\ >>       ÂESX_VI_ERROR(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,               Â\ >> -             "%s object has invalid dynamic type", type_name);  Â\ >> +             _("%s object has invalid dynamic type"), typeName); Â\ > > Hmm, cfg.mk already included ESX_VI_ERROR in the list of > msg_gen_function that should have caught this at 'make syntax-check' > time; I wonder why it was being overlooked. ÂOh, probably because > sc_libvirt_unmarked_diagnostics states that it won't find lines where > the format string is on a separate line. ÂSame goes for > sc_unmarked_diagnostics from gnulib's maint.mk; wonder if there's a way > to improve the syntax checker. > > At any rate, ACK. > Thanks, pushed. Matthias -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list