On 04/12/2011 01:23 PM, Paolo Smiraglia wrote: > Hi Michael! > Thanks for the reply. Comments are inline. > >> Hi Paolo, >> so basically this is about IPSec driver implementation to the libvirt ? > Exactly... > Ok, right. I don't know much about IPSec itself so some study on the matter would be necessary to provide some better understanding however from what I know the implementation to the Linux kernel directly is possible for the software stack however implementing this in the virtual hardware stack (emulation) is certainly a good thing since you don't need to patch the kernel at all. The only thing I'm not sure about is the technical point of view since I don't know how hard would the implementation be. >> I don't think the idea is bad however I'm not working on libvirt too >> much so you should ask libvirt guys about they opinion. >> >> Since I think implementing this may be a good idea I'm putting DV to the >> CC list for his opinion on this matter. > Thanks for the "support of the cause". ;-) No problem since I think the idea is good and therefore I support the idea at least :) Have a great time, Michal -- Michal Novotny <minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx>, RHCE Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list