Hi Eric, (2011/04/02 1:31), Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/30/2011 11:19 PM, Taku Izumi wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This patchset enables us to configure inactive domain's maximum memory >> size. I redesigned according to Daniel-san's commnet. > >> The following patchset is the prerequisite of these. >> => http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-March/msg01057.html > > My sincere apologies at the delay on these series. I've been so focused > on locking bugs and libvirtd crashers that I haven't had a chance to > properly review any of the persistent settings patches in time for > inclusion in 0.9.0. My justification is that you can always achieve > persistent settings (albeit with undue pain) by raw XML editing, so this > is just an enhancement request rather than a bug fix. However, now that > we've missed the feature freeze deadline for 0.9.0, you have my promise > that I will be reviewing this next week for inclusion in 0.9.1. > That's OK, I don't mind. Please review this after releasing 0.9.0. Best regards, Taku Izumi -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list