> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:54:07PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:57:10PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> this is the patch to introduce the TXT record support for the DNS >>>> service on the virtual network. This can be defined using the >>>> txt-record subelement in the dns element of the network XML >>>> description. >>>> >>>> First patch is adding TXT record support to the DNS service on >>>> the virtual network and the second patch is adding support for >>>> defining hosts for the DNS service. >>>> >>>> The new definition syntax is: >>>> >>>> <dns> >>>> <txt-record name="example name" value="example value" /> >>>> <host ip='192.168.122.1'> >>>> <hostname>gateway</hostname> >>>> <hostname>host</hostname> >>>> </host> >>>> </dns> >>>> >>>> Where multiple host elements can be defined to put the aliases >>>> for specified IP addresses. >>>> >>>> The patch series has been tested for the configuration and it >>>> was working fine and also RelaxNG schema with the tests have >>>> been both altered to add test cases to test those patches. >>>> >>>> Both of the patches passed make, syntax checking and all the >>>> tests. >>> Principle sounds fine but let's defer this to after 0.9.0, :) >>> >>> Daniel >>> >> Oh, do you mean we not only put this to version after 0.9.0 but also we >> add some new things to this as well? >> >> Is my patch good for this and will we just merge it to "after 0.9.0" >> version or should we rewrite it entirely once it's OK? Since I don't >> work in libvirt team maybe I won't be working on this one (unless >> somebody ask me to do it) so based on this fact I'm not primarily >> working in the libvirt team I may not know about whether work on this >> one is on or not so maybe it's good if you ask me to work on this when >> it's on or lead the assigned engineer to ask me about this. > Just that we are in freeze for 0.9.0, so I suggest to review and > apply this there after, say early next week, > > Daniel > Well, that way I think it's OK and committee could simply change 0.9.0 in the formatnetwork.html.in to 0.9.1 if there are no further issues with the patch itself and once it's ACKed :) Michal -- Michal Novotny <minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx>, RHCE Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list