On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/29/2011 01:27 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>> Paolo, any thoughts on the best approach to take? (I know which way I'm
>> leaning, but want some feedback before I give away my bias).
>
> Without guessing what your bias is, I also :) prefer to implement
> {g,s}et_nonblock_flag functions. It would use either
> SetNamedPipeHandleState or ioctlsocket (using the socket detection trick in
> sockets.c to detect sockets, and then GetFileType to detect pipes if it
> fails).
>
> This module can then be used to build a fcntl F_GETFL/F_SETFL
> implementation, but it is not very important to do so.
Could you also implement SOCK_NONBLOCK ?
Bastien
> Paolo
>
>
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list