Re: [RFC, PATCH] Re: xen:/// vs. xen://FQDN/ vs xen+unix:/// discrepancy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Jim,

Am Donnerstag 17 März 2011 21:11:34 schrieb Jim Fehlig:
> Philipp Hahn wrote:
> > Today I encountered the bug again: "virsh list" was not showing any
> > domain, while "virsh -c xen+unix:///" did show "Domain 0" and my other
> > domain.
>
> Are you using xen unstable or Xen 4.1 (i.e. something greater than Xen
> 4.0)?

No, this was with Xen 3.4.3.

> If so, the sysctl and domctl versions have changed, which 
> essentially breaks the xen_hypervisor sub-driver.  I ran into this
> problem while trying to get the libxl and xen-unified drivers to play
> nicely together - wasted a bunch of my testing time :-(.  I'll send a
> patch to handle the new sysctl and domctl versions.

Good to head your XenLight work is making progress.

Sincerely
Philipp Hahn
-- 
Philipp Hahn           Open Source Software Engineer      hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Univention GmbH        Linux for Your Business        fon: +49 421 22 232- 0
Mary-Somerville-Str.1  D-28359 Bremen                 fax: +49 421 22 232-99
                                                   http://www.univention.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]