On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:58:25PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:31:07AM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote: > > On 03/10/2011 07:12 AM, Lyre wrote: > > >The spec was copied from Radek's original php-libvirt with the > > >License untouched, I'm not sure about it. > > > > > Ok Lyre, then I guess Radek wanted to stick with the PHP licence. > > However by naming it php-libvirt he was violating the licence > > because of following paragraph: > > Can we check with Radek if it's okay to switch to LGPLv2 ? I assume you actually mean LGPLv2+ (ie the or-later variety) > That would be simpler and more in line with libvirt licencing itself, > > Radek, Lyre, would you agree with such a change ? Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list