On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 06:05:22PM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hi, > I don't know who's the right person to ask so I'm posting this into > the libvir-list. We're going to have the libvirt-php package in > Fedora (but renamed to php-libvirt only) but I don't know about the > licencing. The licence in the SPEC file (by Lyre) is set to "PHP" > however the licence file describes the GPL licence. > > My question is whether somebody does know whether it's OK to write a > PHP extension under GPL licence or whether we need the PHP licence > for this. The PHP license is *not* GPL compatible https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/PHP_License http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses So, the libvirt-php module would have to be under either the PHP license, or something less restrictive. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list