Re: [PATCH] Include stdint.h in libvirt.h for INT64_MAX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:18:44PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:49:34AM +0100, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> > I found this one while trying to compile ruby-libvirt.
> > 
> > Matthias
> 
> > From 6858713a7ea7fad961acbc4d4f3c0c53ede2302d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Matthias Bolte <matthias.bolte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:42:49 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] Include stdint.h in libvirt.h for INT64_MAX
> > 
> > VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_PARAM_UNLIMITED uses INT64_MAX but stdint.h
> > was not included. Therefore, libvirt.h was not selfcontained.
> 
> I'm a little wary of doing this, because stdint.h isn't neccessary
> the most portable header file & while libvirt internally can rely
> on gnulib to fix problems, apps building against libvirt don't
> have that.
> 
> I think it could be better to just define VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_PARAM_UNLIMITED
> directly to the right value, rather than in terms of INT64_MAX

  Agreed we should try to limit the dependancies from public headers
to the minimum, in that case I'm fine hardcoding the value.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]