On 02/10/2011 08:01 AM, Zdenek Styblik wrote:
[...]
Actually, I think these would be _("[<%s>]") (note the<> to signify the
meta-syntactic term). But I like the idea; this shortens the synopsis
form, while still leaving the usage form to explain the meta-syntactic
term.
Right, because '--%s' is mandatory. Should I re-post the patch, or...?
Thanks,
Z.
Should be fine.
Z.
--
Zdenek Styblik
Net/Linux admin
OS TurnovFree.net
email: stybla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
jabber: stybla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>From e3963c04b3e95eee570f4e870c7c44cf211148ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zdenek Styblik <stybla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:25:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Unify virsh help synopsis output
Signed-off-by: Zdenek Styblik <stybla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/virsh.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virsh.c b/tools/virsh.c
index 6d9861f..9063365 100644
--- a/tools/virsh.c
+++ b/tools/virsh.c
@@ -10637,11 +10637,11 @@ vshCmddefHelp(vshControl *ctl, const char *cmdname)
case VSH_OT_INT:
/* xgettext:c-format */
fmt = ((opt->flag & VSH_OFLAG_REQ) ? "<%s>"
- : _("[--%s <number>]"));
+ : _("[<%s>]"));
break;
case VSH_OT_STRING:
/* xgettext:c-format */
- fmt = _("[--%s <string>]");
+ fmt = _("[<%s>]");
break;
case VSH_OT_DATA:
fmt = ((opt->flag & VSH_OFLAG_REQ) ? "<%s>" : "[<%s>]");
--
1.7.3.4
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list