On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:39:33PM +0100, arnaud.champion@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > ?Hi, > > I have maybe a strange thing on a nodedev-dumpxml virsh result : > > virsh # nodedev-dumpxml block_sr0 > <device> > <name>block_sr0</name> > <parent>scsi_0_0_1_0</parent> > <capability type='storage'> > <block>/dev/sr0</block> > <bus>scsi</bus> > <drive_type>cdrom</drive_type> > <model>DVD RW DRU-190S</model> > <vendor>SONY</vendor> > <capability type='removable'> > <media_available>0</media_available> > <media_size>0</media_size> > </capability> > </capability> > </device> > > I think (note I'm not sure), the capabilty type removable should be in the device element, like this : > > virsh # nodedev-dumpxml block_sr0 > <device> > <name>block_sr0</name> > <parent>scsi_0_0_1_0</parent> > <capability type='storage'> > <block>/dev/sr0</block> > <bus>scsi</bus> > <drive_type>cdrom</drive_type> > <model>DVD RW DRU-190S</model> > <vendor>SONY</vendor> > </capability> > <capability type='removable'> > <media_available>0</media_available> > <media_size>0</media_size> > </capability> > > </device> No, 'removable' is a sub-capability of 'storage', hence it is nested. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list