Re: [PATCH 1/1] Do not use virtio-serial port 0 for generic ports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:14:48PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 01:57 PM, David Allan wrote:
> > Per the discussion in:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670394
> > 
> > The port numbering should start from 1, not 0.  We assign maxport + 1,
> > so start maxport at 0.
> > ---
> >  src/conf/domain_conf.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> > index d5445a4..08c21e5 100644
> > --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> > +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> > @@ -5328,7 +5328,7 @@ static virDomainDefPtr virDomainDefParseXML(virCapsPtr caps,
> > 
> >          if (chr->info.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_VIRTIO_SERIAL &&
> >              chr->info.addr.vioserial.port == 0) {
> > -            int maxport = -1;
> > +            int maxport = 0;
> 
> ACK.

Thanks, pushed.

Dave

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]