Re: [PATCH] docs: correct setmem text plus expand setmaxmem text

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/19/2011 12:40 PM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> I wonder in which direction to go in order to unify this: being more
> strict and do "value % 1024 == 0" checks all over the place, or being
> less strict and just divide by 1024.

See also this bug report, where the request was made to round up to the
next integral block size rather than truncate or error out (regardless
of granularity of block size):

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670529

since storage management and volume creation is closely related to
memory sizes in that both suffer from block-sized granularity.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]