Re: [PATCH v2 5/4] Check that boot order sequence is correct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/17/2011 05:46 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Since I haven't pushed the series yet, I can easily squash the following patch
> into patch 2/4.
> 
> Jirka
> 
> From 5302f9ca43e26bd23230ba84e169a0e9109d04e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: <5302f9ca43e26bd23230ba84e169a0e9109d04e8.1295268171.git.jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> From: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:25:31 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Check that boot order sequence is correct
> Mail-Followup-To: libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> The boot order sequence has to be contiguous starting from 1 and without
> duplicates.
> ---
>  src/conf/domain_conf.c |   66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

ACK - looks like a nice use of a bitmap for the solution.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]