Re: Implementing VNC per VM access control lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 11:47 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

> > The option only really makes sense if either vnc_tls_x509_verify or
> > vnc_sasl is set as well, so it may be worth only activating 'acl' in the
> > code if either of those two are also on.
> 
> If you enable 'acl' and don't add any rules to the ACL, then
> no one will be able to connect. So we can't automatically
> add ',acl' when either of those two options you mention are
> present, because that would break all existing usage.

Yes. I'm not suggesting automatically. That obviously wouldn't work.
What I was asking is if vnc_acl=1 should it add it regardless of the
other options or only when either 'vnc_sasl=1' or
'vnc_tls_x509_verify=1' as well.

Regards

Neil



--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]