Re: [TCK] [PATCH v2] Test cases for network ipv6 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/06/2011 10:14 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/05/2011 06:02 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
Looks like I need to be careful where I run the libvirt-tck, as one of
the networks chosen for testing will clobber the route to an important
internal network (10.0.0.0/8) for the duration of the test.
We could choose the private network 172.16.0.0/12 instead, if that helps
for most people.
Would it make sense to choose a subnet of one of the reserved private
ranges, to further reduce the likelihood of collisions; maybe something
like:

172.28.0.0/16

?

Also that would be fine with me. 172.28.255.240/4 would just be as good for the couple of seconds the test runs and verifies that the data makes it into the host configuration.
+</ip>
+</network>
+
It might look nicer for this XML to be indented.

I will indent it.
Or perhaps you had indentation, but this is a case of thunderbird's
formatting bug where it corrupts spacing before<,>,and&  when quoting
or pasting in text?

Yes, that's what happened.

   Stefan

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]