On 01/06/2011 11:33 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > Is this something that is forward-looking (ie. once we also have an > access layer designed, will it still make sense to keep and honor the > qemu.conf setting), or is it enough of a hack that we should instead try > to resolve it via the qemu:commandline approach (where we've explicitly > documented that use of the interface is the approved way to do hacks in > the absence of proper libvirt support)? > > It's definitely a hack that would let us get to the point o Sorry for the incomplete sentence - I rewrote my thoughts into the earlier paragraph but failed to delete the entire first draft before hitting send (I wasn't trying to leave you hanging for more of my thoughts). -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list