On 07/01/2011, at 3:52 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 01/06/2011 09:46 AM, Zdenek Styblik wrote: >> On 01/06/11 17:36, Justin Clift wrote: >>> Hi us, >> [...] >>> "Ascertained" doesn't really make sense to me in this context. Wondering >>> if anyone has better suggestions? :) >> >> >> Hello, >> >> assured/guaranteed? Please please, not ascertained. In the name of all >> not-native-English speaking people :) > > Guaranteed sounds best to me. Thanks guys, that sounds much better: Minimum memory guaranteed for the guest domain during contention, in kilobytes. QEMU and LXC only. Will update now. :) -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list