Re: Back and suggested release schedule

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/23/2010 07:09 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
> ä 2010å12æ22æ 19:30, Daniel Veillard åé:
>>    Hello all,
>>
>> as some of you may have noticed, I'm back online, just in a very
>> different timezone now !
>> I'm still behind on reading the list emails but a lot of the changes
>> in the last month have been refactoring and cleanups, and maybe we ought
>> to make a new release at the end of the month to try to catch possible
>> regressions introduced as early as possible. What do people think of a
>> new
>> release for the new year, which would mean entering freeze over the
>> week-end. My own testing will probably be limited as most of my machines
>> are in boxes in a container somewhere, but I should be able to make
>> a release :-)
>> Also on the release name, should we go 0.9.0 considering the refactorings
>> (i.e. indicating future patches will be harder to apply to earlier
>> branches)
>> or stick to 0.8.7 (considering that there isn't major feature improvement
>> ... unless I missed them !),
>>
>>    Opinions ?
> 
> Vote for 0.8.7, as no major feature improvement indeed.

So the addition of the new vmware workstation backend is not major? :)

I don't have much of a preference, 0.8.7 works for me.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]