On 23/12/2010, at 12:11 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:31:14PM +1100, Justin Clift wrote: >> On 22/12/2010, at 10:30 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: >>> Also on the release name, should we go 0.9.0 considering the refactorings >>> (i.e. indicating future patches will be harder to apply to earlier branches) >>> or stick to 0.8.7 (considering that there isn't major feature improvement >>> ... unless I missed them !), >> >> My initial thinking is 0.8.7, but I don't feel strongly about it. :) >> >> With the "freeze", what's a good process to put in place while frozen to >> make sure only bugs and doc improvements go in? > > Well that should be part of the review process and people who have commit > rights are supposed to know the rules ;-) Heh, sure. Is that approach really working in reality though (recently anyway)? :) I'm thinking... not so much. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list