On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 01:32:16PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 12/04/2010 11:37 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote: > > Well, that would not have helped to detect this. The problem here is > > that we allow undefined symbols to be exported on Linux but use the > > libtool -no-undefined option on Windows because exporting undefined > > symbols doesn't work on Windows. We should probably just use > > -no-undefined on all platforms, or do I miss the reason why we need > > this feature of exporting undefined symbols on Linux? > > I see no reason why we should avoid -no-undefined on Linux. Given that > our libraries should already be completely resolved for the sake of > Windows, using -no-undefined on Linux might serve to help catch bugs > that would affect Windows, and should not have any impact in the normal > case of correct exports. Yep, we should use it everywhere, except that note there is some platform oddity. Win32 platforms must always use -no-undefined while Solaris must always use -Wl,--no-undefined. Linux can use either. So in GTK-VNC I use the former on Win32, and the latter everywhere else. Daniel -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list