On 12/02/2010 03:03 PM, Diego Elio Pettenà wrote: > Il giorno gio, 02/12/2010 alle 10.58 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange ha > scritto: >> I think this is really viable, because it implies we need another >> week prior to creating the pre-release where we do what we currently >> do with pre-release stabalization. > > Note that I said âone week or lessâ. > Less? I'm not sure if everybody can react that fast. I mean there is more to life than just: uh, new libvirt is out. I have to drop everything and test it; j/k :) > >> - A official list of supported platforms / OS combinations >> - Run a test build on each combination before release >> - Actually follow the 'bug fixes' only rule leading upto release >> no matter how simple the new feature might appear. > > And let me guess that the "supported platforms" are going to be mostly > RedHat&co.? Why not warning the rest of the packagers, so that each run > their tests? > This seems to be perfectly fine. You, ehm guys, can't possibly to test every flavor of GNU/Linux. So it seems to be pretty much okay to me. It's up to community around each GNU/Linux distribution to do their own testing. Just my $0.02USD Zdenek -- Zdenek Styblik Net/Linux admin OS TurnovFree.net email: stybla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx jabber: stybla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list