Re: RFC: Supporting IPv6 on libvirt virtual networks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/11/2010, at 5:26 AM, Laine Stump <laine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
> <ip family="ipv6" address="2001:db8:1::10" prefix="128"/>
> <ip family="ipv6" address="2001:4978:2ac::1" prefix="48">
> <radvd/>

Is "radvd" too implementation dependent?

Just thinking that as we expand out our platform support over time, if we support setting up bridges on other OS's then would radvd be what's used?   (I actually have no idea, it may very well be)

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]