On 08/24/2010 02:20 PM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
+static int umlDomainAttachUmlDisk(struct uml_driver *driver, + virDomainObjPtr vm, + virDomainDiskDefPtr disk) +{ + int i, ret; + char *cmd = NULL; + char *reply = NULL; + + for (i = 0 ; i< vm->def->ndisks ; i++) { + if (STREQ(vm->def->disks[i]->dst, disk->dst)) { + umlReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED, + _("target %s already exists"), disk->dst); + return -1; + } + } + + if (!disk->src) { + umlReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, + "%s", _("disk source path is missing")); + goto error; + } + + if (virAsprintf(&cmd, "config %s=%s", disk->dst, disk->src)< 0) { + virReportOOMError(); + return -1; + } + + if (umlMonitorCommand(driver, vm, cmd,&reply)< 0) + goto error; + + if (VIR_REALLOC_N(vm->def->disks, vm->def->ndisks+1)< 0) { + virReportOOMError(); + goto error; + } + + if (ret< 0) + goto error;I was about to push this patch, but compile testing gave this error: uml/uml_driver.c: In function 'umlDomainAttachUmlDisk': uml/uml_driver.c:1729: error: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] I think "if (ret< 0) goto error;" and "int ret;" can just be removed completely from this function, but I would like have your ACK on this before doing so.
ACK to that modification - I don't see any real use of ret in this function. -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list