Re: [PATCH 2/2] qemu: Update next usable PCI slot on domain reconnect

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:57:17PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > > There's no requirement to plug devices in ascending slot order - we can
> > > have gaps at will with any ordering.
> > 
> > At this point, I'm starting to think that we can just drop this 2/2
> > patch and not worry about nextslot being stable across libvirtd restarts.
> 
> Which means we don't even need most of 1/2 since the reason for changing the
> hash payload to be a structure instead of a string was this second patch.
> So what do you think, should I push it as is or make a smaller patch which
> would just fix OOM checking when PCI addresses are converted to strings?

Yep, lets do a simpler patch

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London    -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org        -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]