Il giorno ven, 06/08/2010 alle 06.52 -0600, Eric Blake ha scritto: > > This says to nuke the distributed man page. Which means 'make && make > clean && make' is once again requiring those extra tools. > I wanted to stay as close as possible to the original, since I know people tend to be touchy about these rebuilds ;) > The patch needs to move distributed man pages out of CLEANFILES and > into > MAINTAINERCLEANFILES. Yah, agreed. Will change it in a moment then > I'm also wondering if we need a hook in 'make dist' to ensure the man > pages are up-to-date (now that the developers don't rebuild it from a > fresh tarball, the maintainer should now make sure that a stale copy > from incremental builds does not sneak into the tarball). As far as I can see, this would still trigger a rebuild if timestamp don't match even if it's distributed, so it shouldn't be a problem at all. The important part is that dist/ditcheck is built with libvirtd enabled and not disabled. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/ -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list