On 07/09/2010 06:14 AM, Chris Lalancette wrote:
<snip>
While this is fun and tricky, I'm not 100% convinced that we should do this.
I would think we would want the same manpage regardless of what options are
compiled in. While it could be a bit confusing in that options are listed
in the manpage that aren't actually available in this build, it's at least
consistent. Though I could be convinced otherwise.
I'm ok either way. :)
<snip>
+=head1 AUTHORS
+
+ Andrew Puch<apuch @ redhat.com>
+ Daniel Veillard<veillard @ redhat.com>
This isn't really right, despite what the source comments might say :). From
a "git annotate daemon/libvirtd.c", I see at least:
Maybe just reference the Libvirt Community or something, plus give the URL?
<snip>
+=head1 COPYRIGHT
+
+Copyright (C) 2010 Red Hat, Inc.
+
I'm definitely not a copyright guy, so I'm not sure. I know we have headers
that say this, but as far as I know we don't have copyright assignment for
libvirt. Given the list of authors above, I'm not sure if this is correct or
not.
I just copied from virsh's man page, plus removed the old years.
Should we ask (Red Hat?) legal people for guidance here?
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list