On 06/29/2010 03:50 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
<snip>
virConnectNumOfStoragePools should not call successfully
phypNumOfStoragePools unless the connection URI is for phyp. Does this
patch clean up the mess?
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-June/msg00707.html
Yep, just applied that and recompiled. No segfault in virsh now.
I'll test your v2 version when you submit it as well, just let me know. :)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
--
Salasaga - Open Source eLearning IDE
http://www.salasaga.org
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list