* src/util/bitmap.c (virBitmapAlloc): Tighten sanity check.
---
> > For that matter, should virBitmapAlloc(0) return NULL, instead of it's
> > current behavior of allocating an (empty) bitmap?
> >
>
> Yes, you are right - especially since there is no grow operation
> :-). I should have returned NULL for size 0 request in the original
> version.
Any objections to this?
src/util/bitmap.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/bitmap.c b/src/util/bitmap.c
index 69094a5..44edb49 100644
--- a/src/util/bitmap.c
+++ b/src/util/bitmap.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
/*
* bitmap.h: Simple bitmap operations
*
+ * Copyright (C) 2010 Red Hat, Inc.
* Copyright (C) 2010 Novell, Inc.
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ virBitmapPtr virBitmapAlloc(size_t size)
virBitmapPtr bitmap;
size_t sz;
- if (SIZE_MAX - VIR_BITMAP_BITS_PER_UNIT < size)
+ if (SIZE_MAX - VIR_BITMAP_BITS_PER_UNIT < size || size == 0)
return NULL;
sz = (size + VIR_BITMAP_BITS_PER_UNIT - 1) /
--
1.7.0.1
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list