On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:17:38AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> HAL is deprecated and UDEV is the future. Thus if both
> options are compiled, we should prefer use of UDEV over
> HAL
>
> * src/node_device/node_device_driver.c: Switch init
> order to try UDEV first, then HAL
> ---
> src/node_device/node_device_driver.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/node_device/node_device_driver.c b/src/node_device/node_device_driver.c
> index a6c1fa0..42363be 100644
> --- a/src/node_device/node_device_driver.c
> +++ b/src/node_device/node_device_driver.c
> @@ -658,8 +658,8 @@ void registerCommonNodeFuncs(virDeviceMonitorPtr driver)
> int nodedevRegister(void) {
> #if defined(HAVE_HAL) && defined(HAVE_UDEV)
> /* Register only one of these two - they conflict */
> - if (halNodeRegister() == -1)
> - return udevNodeRegister();
> + if (udevNodeRegister() == -1)
> + return halNodeRegister();
> return 0;
> #else
> # ifdef HAVE_HAL
> --
> 1.6.6.1
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
ACK
Dave
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list