On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 16:55 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:32 -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> > On 5/20/10 1:10 PM, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > <vsi type='802.1Qbg'>
> >
> > Can we use something more generic than <vsi></vsi> since VSI is a .bg term?
> > Something like virtual_port?
>
> Fine with me. How about <virtualport/>?
I made this change and the previously posted patch has of course changed
quite a bit while getting rid of occurrences of vsi in variables and
structure names in the code. Also part 2/3 of the [RFC] patch I posted
needed to be adapted.
Stefan
>
> Stefam
>
> >
> > -scott
> >
>
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list