On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:13:49AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 11:01:21AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > libvirt.spec.in | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
> > index cb41ea1de1..9217820137 100644
> > --- a/libvirt.spec.in
> > +++ b/libvirt.spec.in
> > @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@
> >
> > %define arches_qemu_kvm %{ix86} x86_64 %{power64} %{arm} aarch64 s390x riscv64
> > %if 0%{?rhel}
> > - %if 0%{?rhel} > 8
> > + %if 0%{?rhel} >= 10
> > + %define arches_qemu_kvm x86_64 aarch64 s390x riscv64
>
> AFAICT the qemu-kvm.spec in centos-stream still only has
>
> ExclusiveArch: x86_64 %{power64} aarch64 s390x
>
> so adding this in libvirt is premature and would lead to unresolvable
> dependencies until QEMU is built on riscv64.
We're working on several packages at once, so you can assume that
QEMU will have been handled by the time we get to boostrapping CentOS
Stream 10. Doing things in strict dependency order would only
introduce unnecessary complications and delays.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
