Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 14:40 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange a écrit : > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 03:15:48PM +0200, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > > > > So, it looks like there's a difference in the way libvirt starts guests > > between autoboot and a manual virsh start. > > Yep, there's a design bug in the way this is implemented in the QEMU driver. > The code that restores the snapshot is in the qemudDomainStart() method, > rather than qemudStartVMDaemon(). This means that when the guest is > autostarted, the snapshot restore is missed. Ok, thanks for the clarification. I'll try to look at this, but I don't think I'll be able to fixe anything ;) so I'll wait a little more. Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SARL. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Technopôle Montesquieu 33650 MARTILLAC Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Fax : 05 56 64 15 32 Mail: daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Web : http://www.firewall-services.com -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list