On 05/14/2010 04:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > virFileResolveLink was returning a positive value on error, > thus confusing callers that assumed failure was < 0. The > confusion is further evidenced by callers that would have > ended up calling virReportSystemError with a negative value > instead of a valid errno. > > Fixes Red Hat BZ #591363. > > * src/util/util.c (virFileResolveLink): Live up to documentation. > * src/qemu/qemu_security_dac.c > (qemuSecurityDACRestoreSecurityFileLabel): Adjust callers. > * src/security/security_selinux.c > (SELinuxRestoreSecurityFileLabel): Likewise. > * src/storage/storage_backend_disk.c > (virStorageBackendDiskDeleteVol): Likewise. Yep, makes lots of sense. ACK -- Chris Lalancette -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list