Re: [PATCH v2 00/36] Add support for versioned CPU models

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 10:32:40PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Each CPU model with -v* suffix is defined as a standalone model copying
> all attributes of the previous version although CPU model versions with
> an alias are handled differently. The full definition is used for the
> alias and the versioned model is created as an identical copy of the
> alias.
> 
> To avoid breaking migration compatibility of host-model CPUs all
> versioned models are marked with <decode guest='off'/> so that they are
> ignored when selecting candidates for host-model. It's not ideal but not
> doing so would break almost all host-model CPUs as the new versioned CPU
> models have all vmx-* features included since their introduction while
> existing CPU models were updated later. This meas existing models would
> be accompanied with a long list of vmx-* features to properly describe a
> host CPU while the newly added CPU models would have those features
> enabled implicitly and their list of features would be significantly
> shorter. Thus the new models would always be better candidates for
> host-model than the existing models.
> 
> 
> Version 2:

For everything

Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>

but see my commentary against the "Denverton" patch.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux